EFFECT OF SEED PRIMING WITH MANGANESE AND BORON ON GROWTH, YIELD AND SEED QUALITY OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.)

Section: RESEARCH

Abstract

This study was conducted at two locations; the field of Khabat Technical Institute-Erbil Polytechnic University and field of agriculture directory in Harir-Erbil, during spring 2021. To study the effect of seed priming with manganese and boron on growth, yield and quality of chickpea. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications was used, the first factor represented priming of seeds by four concentrations of manganese: (0, 2, 4 and 6 g liter-1) and second factor boron (0, 2, 4 and 6 g liter-1). Seed priming by 4 g liter-1 of manganese and 4 g liter-1 of boron from Harir location produced the heights of plant height (cm), leaf area (cm2), leaf area index, dry matter (g m2), number of pod plant-1, number of seeds pod-1, weight of 100 seeds (g), seed yield (kg ha-1) and protein yield (kg ha-1). The heights percentage of protein%, oil% and nitrogen% was recorded at 2 g liter-1 of Mn and B, while carbohydrate%, phosphorus% and potassium% recorded at 4 g liter-1 of Mn and 2 g liter-1 of B from both locations. From interaction between manganese and boron concentrations was from Harir location at 4 g liter-1 of Mn with 4 g liter-1 of B for all growth parameters, yield and yield components, but the heights percentage of protein%, oil% and nitrogen%, was recorded from interaction Mn with B at 2 g liter-1, while carbohydrate%, phosphorus% and potassium% was recorded at 4 g liter-1 Mn with 2 g liter-1 B from both locations.

References

Download this PDF file

Statistics

How to Cite

EFFECT OF SEED PRIMING WITH MANGANESE AND BORON ON GROWTH, YIELD AND SEED QUALITY OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.). (2023). Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture, 51(2), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.33899/magrj.2023.138908.1221

How to Cite

EFFECT OF SEED PRIMING WITH MANGANESE AND BORON ON GROWTH, YIELD AND SEED QUALITY OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.). (2023). Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture, 51(2), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.33899/magrj.2023.138908.1221